COGS RATE GODS: Hephaestus/Vulcan/The Ambidexter

Vulcan edition of cogs rate gods circo del herrero hephaestus the automation gabbler bla automata
Vulcan Edition
[Content warning. Gods do terrible things sometimes. We discuss topics like sexual assault and violence in this series.]

GABBLER: Welcome to our first post for COGS RATE GODS, where we talk about, and then proceed to rate, a god.

BLA: And then get smited – smote? – for our hubris…

GABBLER: I mean, we’ve survived this long, we’ll be fine. Just look what you’ve said about Them in our books.

BLA: You call this fine? We’re literally blogging about gods for readership. Anyone who comes here is just gawking, wanting to see our fate.

GABBLER: Moving on! So, in these posts we’re going to highlight our favorite things about a god and maybe disagree with each other a bit and then come to some sort of average rating (that you yourself might disagree with! Let us know if we’re wrong in the comments – #engagement). For this kickoff edition of CRG, we’re starting with the elephant in the room. AKA Vulcan. AKA, Hephaestus. AKA, the reason BLA wrote The Automation and The Pre-programming in the first place. One of which is permafree for you to download if you look hard enough.

BLA: Shameless plug. But yeah, He’s a main player in those memoirs.

GABBLER: Fictions, ahem.

BLA: Whatever. Also, I wouldn’t compare V. to an elephant. He’s more of a Donkey. That’s His sacred animal.

GABBLER: That’s true. Doesn’t that come from the fact He rode on one as Dionysus brought Him back to Olympus drunk?

BLA: I think it’s because He’s an ass. Kind of a big one. As you’ll see in our books…

G: Who’s shameless now? lol He’s definitely played a big role in your life – our lives, now, I guess. But, you clearly have some…interesting interpretations of Him. What’s one thing you wish more people knew about Him?

BLA: Maybe that He’s the god of technology. Maybe if more people understood what automatons are and that He made some (not necessarily the ones that show up in our books), Gaiman wouldn’t have created Technical Boy in American Gods and the show wouldn’t have weirdly inserted them and their Vulcan character.

G: Oh, geez. Don’t get started on American Gods. We promised each other we’d try not to.

BLA: What? But you even agree with me! You’ve started making comics to illustrate my point. You even said so in a press release recently.

G: Yeah, yeah. Poking holes in American Gods – TV show or book – is one of  our favorite  things  to do.

But we’re not here to talk about AG. What is it about Vulcan’s tech that is so fascinating for you? And why do you default to “Vulcan” over “Hephaestus” usually in your writing? I think we talk about it in our FAQ, but for those who are new here?

BLA: Well, the Vulcan thing is that it’s easier to type and remember how to spell more than Hephaestus all the time. Also probably easier to pronounce, if I were to speak. Which I don’t – long story. You can read all about said story in * my memoirs. *

G: * Fictions *

BLA: But yeah, His tech is one of the most overlooked things. That, or there’s only this shallow understanding. A lot of writers seem to focus on his disability and how He’s maybe not the most attractive god, yet He married Aphrodite. The fact She cheated on Him with Ares. People love a good scandal, and they feel bad for Him. But they shouldn’t. He’s doing just fine.

G: Yeah, that’s what gods do. They have a lot of fun and sometimes cause a lot of trouble. They aren’t saints. It’s kind of like following a reality TV show.

BLA: Like rooting for your favorite wrestler in WWE. Everyone has an opinion on what’s really going on and people choose sides and choose what to believe.

G: You kind of have to. But hopefully you choose based on behavior and some sort of reality, right?

BLA: Yes, focus on what He’s done for us. For humans. He’s a Promethean figure for me, honestly. I would argue He’s on our side. He doesn’t take shit from other gods and They’re constantly going to Him because They need Him and His skills.

G: So you think people should focus on His inventions?

BLA: Yes and no. I just think they’re a more interesting aspect about Him. Sure, His trap/snare gets brought up in the Aphrodite/Ares affair but He also traps his mother Hera in a similar fashion. Those aren’t super techy things, though they do show his cleverness. I wish more people knew about His robots – His automata. His tech. Artificial intelligences. He crosses boundaries of what is “real” and what is “life.” For good or bad. The conversation about robots is not new. It’s ancient. Like you’ve even pointed out in past essays.  

G: But what do you mean “He’s on our side?” He’s not always had the best track record of being a moral icon. I think it’s like you said – that we more so feel sorry for Him and what He’s gone through. Being rejected by His mother Hera and tossed out of Olympus, having a disability, being cheated on by His wife…

BLA: Yeah, he gets a pass a lot of times, I feel, because of this.

G: I guess what I’m trying to get at is that He’s not really, say, more ethical than Athena, though, right? He did try to, um, rape Her that one time.

BLA: I might argue that He is though.

G: No way! You’re taking His side on something?! Mind = blown.

BLA: Let me explain. Athena has Her own baggage like with the whole Medusa thing – what she did to her and even Arachne. Those are the big two WTFs for me. So, I’m much less afraid of V. But at the same time you can’t talk about Hephaestus without Athena. No matter what or how you interpret what He did to Athena, something happened – and, sure, I have my own interpretations – but now He’s forever associated with Her as this almost complimentary aspect. They may not be together, but They are grouped together.

Athena Scorning the Advances of Hephaestus by Paris Bordone. One of the more positive interpretations of the myth?

G: Yeah, and She ended up helping raise the child Erichthonius born of that interaction, a child that wasn’t even Hers, which is weird. You and I have grappled with that as well as a million other historians and writers.

BLA:  We all know the gods do some very weird and even bad things and humans are left to make sense of it. But let’s not forget that a lot of what we hear about the gods is coming from third parties as well who put their own spins on things. Even the Muses who inspire the records are a third party and have Their biases, I’m sure.

G: * looks at fourth wall * Sure, honey… Maybe now you should ask me what I think is the most overlooked aspect of Vulcan? Be polite.

BLA: Fine. What is it?

G: Maybe the fact that no matter where the Venus/Vulcan relationship (what I also like to call the “Hephrodite” ship) stands (if you think they stayed “together-together” or not), they’re bound in a marriage of dualities. Even She and Ares are a joining of two opposites, you might say. With Athena and Hephaestus, you have this symbolic binary too – both are gods of crafts but Athena is the female born of man and Hephaestus is the male born of woman. I find Hephaestus’s role in these explorations of gender fascinating.

BLA: Don’t forget where Dionysus fits into that Athena-Hephaestus spectrum.

G: Yeah, Dionysus will have to get His own edition in CRG, but He’s certainly the most non-binary point on this triangle, full of dualities and contradictions Himself.

BLA: That and He’s bffs with Hephaestus. Enough to be the one They send to convince Hephaestus to release Hera from the trap He set.

G: Yeah, I feel like there’s more going on there than just BFFs but I’ll not add my interpretation onto this. I mean, Hephaestus isn’t the only one to ride a donkey, right? Anyways. Next, I want to get your opinion on this quote. Hesiod calls Hephaestus the “renowned Ambidexter” in the Theogony. What does that mean to you?

The Youth of Bacchus William-Adolphe Bouguereau Date: 1884

BLA: It’s fitting to call Him that, because ambidexterity is associated with hands. He works with His hands, not his legs or feet. He’s known as the “crippled god” — to use ableist language here, apologies. But that is also what He calls Himself in Homer: ‘I am a cripple from my birth.’ He’s reclaiming his disability and, I think, using it as a symbol and distinguishing attribute. His followers do it as well. Can flaws really be flaws if they’re divine? If the divine have them too?

G: So it makes Him relatable?

BLA: Yes, even more so than Athena, who seems to have these high standards and needs to be perfect in every way.

G: You really have it out for Athena, dude. She’s kind of the most petty of Them All. You should maybe watch that.

BLA: Oh, so now you’re scared of rating gods?

G: Let’s get to it, all I’m saying. Out of 5 stars what do you rate Vulcan?

BLA: No stars for screwing up my life!

G: But did He? According to you He’s the reason we’re together.

BLA: True… 5 begrudging stars, then.

G: 5 stars from me too. That averages out to 5/5. Congrats, V. So far, you’re in the lead. The lead of whatever this is.

BLA: Maybe every year we should do a fantasy league contest where readers vote off the ones we score the highest.

G: That means we better start rating more gods! Until next time, mortals.


Why I’m already concerned about the Starz TV adaptation of Neil Gaiman’s American Gods


Hi. BLA here. Coming to remind you of what Neil Gaiman said back in 2010 about not setting one of his books in “America”:

“The great thing about having an English cemetery is I could go back a very, very, very long way. And in America, you go back 250 years (in a cemetery), and then suddenly you’ve got a few dead Indians, and then you don’t have anybody at all, unless you decide to set it up in Maine or somewhere and sneak in some Vikings.” [Via]

A “few dead Indians” is what you’re supposed to pay attention to here. Now, surpassing debates on what he meant or didn’t intend to do in that interview, we can look at his colonial mentality in his work itself. Take this statement about American Gods:

And perhaps most offensive, we’ll get the book’s Big Statement About America, which is bizarrely insulting to Native Americans. Near the end of the novel, a Native American with magical powers named Whiskey Jack tells Shadow he’s not a god, but rather a “culture hero,” because the land we call America “is not a good country for gods.” [Via]

Neil Gaiman consistently glazes over Native Americans/Indigenous peoples and their cultures. Something I’m sure he has learned to correct by this point, but it was something I had hoped the creators of the new TV show adaptation would rethink in the story. However, it doesn’t seem likely. Sure, sure, they can update Technology Boy to not be so technologically illiterate, but this recent EW article doesn’t give me hope for the story’s cultural literacy:

“Neil created this wonderfully stuffed toy box filled with all sorts of cultural points of view on how American operates as a system, and that was so fascinating and mythological in and of itself,” says Fuller. “It’s really much more of an immigration story than it is a god story.” Green adds, “One of the biggest challenges was stripping the idea of gods as X-Men or giant empowered creatures who stomp on cities and throw the oceans. We wanted them to be people with problems. It’s not about lightning bolts – it’s about the question of day-to-day survival.”

So, we’re still talking about immigrants? Colonizer problems? Nothing has changed. Dear Hollywood and Neil Gaiman, just because your story doesn’t whitewash doesn’t mean it’s not racist.

See also, The Gods Don’t Need Your Worship. 

[“BLA and GB Gabbler” (really just a pen name – singular) are the Editor and Narrator behind THE AUTOMATION, vol. 1 of the Circo del Herrero series. They are on facebook, twitter, tumblr, goodreads, and Vulcan’s shit list.]

all yellowB&N | Amazon | Etc.