GABBLER RECOMMENDS: An Uncomplicated Man Emily Wilson in the London Review of Books

“The race-neutral casting of Nolan’s Odyssey was inevitably deplored in some quarters. But there is nothing progressive about it. Most of the non-white actors – Zendaya, Lupita Nyong’o, Himesh Patel, Corey Antonio Hawkins, Travis Scott – play versions of the Black best friend, whose only role in the drama is to provide aid to the white protagonist. Scott, as the Ithacan bard, Phemius, yells a few words and pounds a stick, but does not get to sing, tell a story or play the lyre: the most melodic note in the percussive soundtrack comes from the plucking of Odysseus’ bow (a beautiful sonic image of the archer as musician, borrowed from the poem). Nyong’o’s double part as Helen and Clytemnestra is hugely underwritten; she is given only a few minutes of screen time to perform a set of brief tableaux of female victims (the outraged bereaved mother, the abused wife, the repentant adulteress).

There are more female characters than in most Nolan movies, thanks to the source material. But none of them has much to say, in contrast to the characterisations in the poem. Homer’s Calypso has a wonderfully outraged, operatic speech about divine double standards: male gods can kidnap and rape any mortal woman they desire, but when a goddess tries it, Zeus and his cronies scupper her chances. It’s a clever and comical distortion of the mythological ‘facts’: the poem’s listeners know that it is primarily Athena (a female deity) who is taking Calypso’s mortal victim away from her (Hermes, whom she’s complaining to, is merely the messenger) – and Eos, goddess of the dawn, as we’ve been reminded only a few lines earlier, has not been prohibited by the divine patriarchy from holding on to Tithonus. Charlize Theron’s Calypso looks gorgeous, but she is never angry, never funny, not skilled in rhetoric, and never consumed by lust for her scraggly mortal victim. She’s an unpaid therapist, soothing the soul of the bedraggled, PTSD-ridden Odysseus with drugs, and graciously listening to his disjointed tale of woe.

It’s a challenge to represent deities on film without veering into Clash of the Titans silliness, so Nolan may have been sensible to leave them out. Even Zendaya’s underwritten Athena turns out to be a vulnerable victim of war, or perhaps a projection of Odysseus’ conscience – not a scheming and bloodthirsty war goddess. Other goddesses appear in cameo – Calypso, the seal-lady Sirens, Circe, Scylla and Charybdis – but there is no sign that we are supposed to realise they are goddesses. Poseidon, Hermes and Helius do not appear in person, although there are some scary storms and shipwrecks. One of my favourite moments was when Zendaya assures Damon that gods are not hard for mortals to understand: ‘Who doesn’t understand thunder? Fire?’ But the film wants to have it both ways. There are no gods, and yet shipwrecks and death are presented as the inevitable consequence of blinding the son of Poseidon and devouring the Cattle of the Sun. Zeus’ law is portrayed as being crucially important, and yet there is no Zeus. Nolan’s vision of the world is not quite big enough to include either real gods or real people who might be different from us.

 

The most obvious new spin that Nolan brings to the source material is a subplot based on a story from the Aeneid, describing the way the Trojans were tricked into taking the Trojan Horse (an invention of ‘cruel Ulysses’) into the city, thanks to the machinations of a Greek double agent called Sinon (his name means ‘harmful’). In contrast to the relatively positive representation of cunning intelligence in Homer’s Odyssey, Virgil makes Ulysses cruel and predatory; Sinon is his deceitful accomplice.

In Nolan’s movie, Sinon is played by Elliot Page, and far from being a bad guy he’s the film’s moral centre. He is recruited to the Trojan War as a plucky youngster, thanks to the evil machinations of a teenage draft-dodger, Antinous (played in adulthood by a charismatically slimy Robert Pattinson). The main emotional arc of the film concerns Odysseus’ belated realisation that he is complicit in Sinon’s exploitation because he failed to tell him the truth about the Trojan Horse plot. Once he recovers his memory, Odysseus is racked by guilt. The film doesn’t address the moral dilemmas raised by its own narrative invention, such as why it matters so much whether Batman told the whole truth to valiant Robin, given that he would be killed instantly either way – or why the sinless Sinon wants in on the scheme, if the sack of Troy was as bad as the movie wants to suggest. Odysseus’ lie to Sinon doesn’t start the Trojan War, and the Trojans would presumably have taken the horse into the city anyway – as they do in Homer’s Odyssey. This muddled subplot is foisted on the film in order to make Nolan’s relentlessly didactic point about the contemporary Anglophone world: that the lies and xenophobia of the war on terror and Brexit began a cultural decline that is now destroying the values ‘we’ hold most dear.”

[Via]

Richard Lattimore’s translation of Aphrodite’s affair & Hephaestus’s snare – The Odyssey, Book 8, lines 266-364:

venus and mars together glitching under the snare of vulcan
Yet another image for our most relevant portion of The Odyssey

 

“Demodokos struck the lyre and began singing well the story

about the love of Ares and sweei-garlanded Aphrodite,

how they first lay together in the house of Hephaistos

secretly; he gave her much and fouled the marriage

and bed of the lord Hephaistos; to him there came as messenger

Helios, the sun, who had seen them lying in love together.

Hephaistos, when he had heard the heartsore story of it,

went on his way to his smithy, heart turbulent with hard sorrows,

and set the great anvil upon its stand, and hammered out fastenings

that could not be slipped or broken, to hold them fixed in position.

Now when, in his anger against Ares, he had made this treacherous

snare, he went to his chamber where his own dear bed lay,

and spun his fastenings around the posts from every direction,

while many more were suspended overhead, from the roof beams,

thin, Iike spider webs, which not even one of the blessed

gods could see. He had fashioned it to be very deceptive.

But when he had spun about the bedstead all of his treacherous

device, he started for Lemnos, the strong-founded citadel,

which, of all territories on earth, was far dearest to him.

Nor did Ares of the golden reins keep a blind watch on him,

as he saw Hephaistos the glorious smith go away, but he then

took his course so he entered the house of glorious Hephaistos,

lusting after the love of sweet-garlanded Kythereia.

She had lately come in from the house of her father, the powerful

son of Kronos, and sat there when Ares entered the house. Then

he took her by the hand and spoke to her and named her, saying:

‘Come, my dear, let us take our way to the bed, and lie there,

for Hephaistos is no longer hereabouts, but by this time

he must have come to Lemnos and the wild-spoken Sintians.’

So he spoke, and she was well pleased to sleep with him. These two

went to bed, and slept there, and all about them were bending

the artful bonds that had been forged by subtle Hephaistos,

so neither of them could stir a limb or get up, and now

they saw the truth, and there was no longer a way out for them.

The glorious smith of the strong arms came and stood near. He had

turned back on his way, before ever reaching the Lemnian country,

for Helios had kept watch for him, and told him the story.

He took his way back to his own house, heart grieved within him,

and stood there in the forecourt, with the savage anger upon him,

and gave out a terrible cry and called to all the immortals:

‘Father Zeus and all you other blessed immortal

gods, come here, to see a ridiculous sight, no seemly

matter, how Aphrodite daughter of Zeus forever

holds me in little favor, but she loves ruinous Ares

because he is handsome, and goes sound on his feet, while I am

misshapen from birth, and for this I hold no other responsible

but my own father and mother, and I wish they never had got me,

Now look and see, where these two have gone to bed and lie there

in love together. I am sickened when I look at them, and yet

I think they will not go on lying thus even for a little,

much though they are in love, I think they will have no wish

for sleeping, but then my fastenings and my snare will contain them

until her father pays back in full all my gifts of courtship

I paid out into his hand for the sake of his bitch-eyed daughter.

The girl is beautiful indeed, but she is intemperate.’

So he spoke, and the gods gathered to the house with the brazen

floor. Poseidon came, the shaker of the earth, and the kindly

Hermes came, and the lord who works from afar, Apollo,

but the female gods remained each at her home, for modesty.

The gods, the givers of good things, stood there in the forecourt,

and among the blessed immortals uncontrollable laughter

went up as they saw the handiwork of subtle Hephaistos.

And thus they would speak to each other, each looking at the god next

him:

‘No virtue in bad dealings. See, the slow one has overtaken

the swift, as now slow Hephaistos has overtaken

Ares, swiftest of all the gods on Olympos, by artifice,

though he was lame, and Ares must pay the adulterer’s damage.’

This was the way of the gods as they conversed with each other,

but the lord Apollo son of Zeus said a word to Hermes:

‘Hermes, son of Zeus, guide and giver of good things, tell me,

would you, caught tight in these strong fastenings, be willing

to sleep in bed by the side of Aphrodite the golden?’

Then in turn the courier Argeiphontes answered:

‘Lord who strike from afar, Apollo, I wish it could only

be, and there could be thrice this number of endless fastenings,

and all you gods could be looking on and all the goddesses,

and still I would sleep by the side of Aphrodite the golden.’

He spoke, and there was laughter among the immortals, only

there was no laughter for Poseidon, but he kept entreating

Hephaistos, the famous craftsman, asking him to set Ares

free, and spoke aloud to him and addressed him in winged words:

‘Let him go, and I guarantee he will pay whatever

you ask, all that is approved among the immortal deities.’

Then in turn the renowned smith of the strong arms answered:

‘Shaker of the earth, Poseidon, do not urge this on me.

The business of wretches is wretched even in guarantee giving.

To what could I hold you among the immortal gods, if Ares

were to go off, avoiding both his debt and his bondage?’

Then in turn Poseidon, shaker of the earth, answered:

‘Hephaistos, if Ares goes off and escapes, not paying

anything he may owe you, then I myself will pay it.’

Then in turn the renowned smith of the strong arms answered:

‘It cannot be, and it is not right, that I should deny you.’

So mighty Hephaistos spoke and undid the fastenings. Straightway

the two of them, when they were set free of the fastening, though it

was so strong, sprang up, and Ares took his way Thraceward,

while she, Aphrodite lover of laughter, went back to Paphos

on Cyprus, where lies her sacred precinct and her smoky altar,

and there the Graces bathed her and anointed her with ambrosial

oil, such as abounds for the gods who are everlasting,

and put delightful clothing about her, a wonder to look on.

So the famous singer sang his song, and Odysseus

enjoyed it in his heart as he listened, as did the others

there, Phaiakians, men of the long oar, famed for seafaring.”

 

We’ll Help You Find Your Next Great Book. (Spoiler: It’s the ‘Odyssey.’) | The New York Times

‘As the critic and classicist Daniel Mendelsohn puts it in the introduction to his recent translation, “The ‘Odyssey’ bequeathed to the West entire genres,” from science fiction to romantic comedy. In that spirit, we offer this guide, confident that whatever kind of story you’re looking for, you’ll find it in Homer.’

[Via]

Against Narrative, works from 2023:

1)  The Tyranny of the Tale by By Parul Sehgal: ‘Anyone in my line has every incentive to fall in step, to proclaim the supremacy of narrative, and then, modestly, to propose herself, as one professionally steeped in story, to be of some small use. Blame it on the cortisol, though: there’s no stanching the skepticism. How inconspicuously narrative winds around us, soft as fog; how efficiently it enables us to forget to look up and ask: What is it that story does not allow us to see?

Return to storytelling’s primal scene: Scheherazade telling tales in order to live to see another dawn. Before it is anything else, a story is a way we can speak to one another without necessarily being ourselves; that is its risk and relief, its portable privacy. The fact that children ask for stories at night is used to defend the notion of storytelling as natural, deeply human—a defense against the dark. But Margaret Wise Brown, the author of “Goodnight Moon,” was convinced that children didn’t care much about plot; it was their parents who did. When children ask for stories, what they’re asking for is the presence of the adult. One wonders just whom Scheherazade was regaling in that room. When did her gaze shift from the king to the children, as it must have? What kind of armor did she think she was providing them?

It is also a strange, inadvertent echo of Peter Pan. Peter cannot grow up, he tells Wendy, because he was never told stories: “None of the lost boys know any stories.” Without being imparted a sense of narrative, he cannot establish his own.’ [Via]

2) Letting the Story Go: Field Notes from a Brutal Time by Janet Steen: ‘I gave up on the basic elements of storytelling. Setting, plot, character, theme. When I applied them to my brother’s life, I couldn’t get things to line up. What exactly was the “rising action”? What was the beginning of the denouement? What were the salient details? “I wanted to know more about the main character,” people always say in writing workshops. Yes, I wanted to know more about the main character. I had assumed I would have years and years to learn more about him. …

Stories were a way to freeze time. And time was an illusion anyway, my various guides were telling me. And everything was constantly changing, constantly becoming something else we couldn’t possibly imagine or predict. Memories were essentially old stories. The present moment was the only place where the memories and fantasies ceased.

This change in view felt both liberating and destructive. Who are you if you aren’t your conditioning, if you’re not the product of your past? What exactly is under there?

The most radical part of this process was finding out that I could withstand an enormous amount of emotional pain. Rupert Spira’s teachings especially helped with this, or maybe I was just partial to his gentle, deeply intelligent explanations in the YouTube videos I found and devoured. He was in the nondual tradition stemming from Advaita Vedanta, and what he calls the direct path. The direct path led you straight to your essential nature, which was pure awareness and devoid of, or beyond, thought or emotional content or objective experience.

But he also talked about the tantric approach, which was about bringing feelings close, so close that it was just the raw experience—not the story, not the thought, but “the raw experience in the body.” So instead of the separate self going into flight from the experience, you were absolutely up against it, feeling it as sensation.

I tried this. I went up against the grief, the longing, the missing, the keening, the despair. I touched into it, withdrew, touched into it again. I stayed there with it for as long as I could.

If something shocking and terrible happens, you might feel that you’re going to be consumed by the feelings about it. The intensity of them threatens absolutely everything and, naturally, you don’t want to go near them. But then you do. And in doing so there is some kind of distillation. It is nothing other than what it is in its purest form. And then, although I didn’t know this for quite some time, there begins to be an alchemical change.

In good moments I make him into a character, a mythic figure, because I can. Who is to stop me? It’s a creative act. I can make him into what I want and need him to be. He’s not a ghost. He’s a guide, a teacher, showing me the way out of darkness. He’s a doorway leading me out of a closed room.’ [Via]

3) The Movie James Franco Doesn’t Want You To See by Lola Sebastian:

GABBLER RECOMMENDS: Why Are We So Resistant to the Idea of a Modern Myth?

‘Experts, I fear, aren’t much help here. You can collect academic definitions for as long as your patience lasts. “The word myth,” as Northrop Frye rightly says, “is used in such a bewildering variety of contexts that anyone talking about it has to say first of all what his chosen context is.” Folklorist Liz Locke put it more bluntly in 1998: “such a state of semantic disarray and/or ambiguity is truly extraordinary.”

Finnish folklorist Lauri Honko nonetheless gives a definition that kind of sounds like what you’d expect from an expert: a myth is

a story of the gods, a religious account of the beginning of the world, the creation, fundamental events, the exemplary deeds of the gods as a result of which the world, nature and culture were created together with all parts thereof and given their order, which still obtains. A myth expresses and confirms society’s religious values and norms, it provides a pattern of behavior to be imitated, testifies to the efficacy of ritual with its practical ends and establishes the sanctity of cult.

This is a fair appraisal of how myth has often been regarded by anthropologists. But it is fraught with dangers and traps. Like the word “anthropology” itself, it seems to offer an invitation to make myth something “other”: something belonging to cultures not our own, and most probably to ones that even in the circles of liberal academics retain an air of the “primitive.” Gods, creation, ritual, cult: these are surely notions that we in the developed world have left behind and only pick up again with an air of irony. Our “gods” are not real beings or agencies but metaphorical cravings (“he worships money”) or celebrities (rock gods and sex goddesses).

This picture is tenacious, and I suspect it accounts for much of the resistance to the notion (and there is a lot of resistance, believe me) that anything created in modern times might deserve to be called a “myth.” To accept that we have never relinquished myths and myth-making might seem to be an admission that we are not quite modern and rational. But all I am asking, with the concept of myth I use in this book, is that we accept that we have not resolved all the dilemmas of human existence, all the questions about our origins or our nature—and that, indeed, modernity has created a few more of them.

One objection to the idea of a modern myth is that, to qualify as myth, a story must contain elements and characters that someone somewhere believes literally existed or happened. Surely myths can’t emerge from works of fiction! The anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski asserted as much, saying of myth that “it is not of the nature of fiction, such as we read today in a novel, but it is a living reality, believed to have once happened in primeval times, and continuing ever since to influence the world and human destinies.”’

 

[Via]