Against Narrative, works from 2023:

1)  The Tyranny of the Tale by By Parul Sehgal: ‘Anyone in my line has every incentive to fall in step, to proclaim the supremacy of narrative, and then, modestly, to propose herself, as one professionally steeped in story, to be of some small use. Blame it on the cortisol, though: there’s no stanching the skepticism. How inconspicuously narrative winds around us, soft as fog; how efficiently it enables us to forget to look up and ask: What is it that story does not allow us to see?

Return to storytelling’s primal scene: Scheherazade telling tales in order to live to see another dawn. Before it is anything else, a story is a way we can speak to one another without necessarily being ourselves; that is its risk and relief, its portable privacy. The fact that children ask for stories at night is used to defend the notion of storytelling as natural, deeply human—a defense against the dark. But Margaret Wise Brown, the author of “Goodnight Moon,” was convinced that children didn’t care much about plot; it was their parents who did. When children ask for stories, what they’re asking for is the presence of the adult. One wonders just whom Scheherazade was regaling in that room. When did her gaze shift from the king to the children, as it must have? What kind of armor did she think she was providing them?

It is also a strange, inadvertent echo of Peter Pan. Peter cannot grow up, he tells Wendy, because he was never told stories: “None of the lost boys know any stories.” Without being imparted a sense of narrative, he cannot establish his own.’ [Via]

2) Letting the Story Go: Field Notes from a Brutal Time by Janet Steen: ‘I gave up on the basic elements of storytelling. Setting, plot, character, theme. When I applied them to my brother’s life, I couldn’t get things to line up. What exactly was the “rising action”? What was the beginning of the denouement? What were the salient details? “I wanted to know more about the main character,” people always say in writing workshops. Yes, I wanted to know more about the main character. I had assumed I would have years and years to learn more about him. …

Stories were a way to freeze time. And time was an illusion anyway, my various guides were telling me. And everything was constantly changing, constantly becoming something else we couldn’t possibly imagine or predict. Memories were essentially old stories. The present moment was the only place where the memories and fantasies ceased.

This change in view felt both liberating and destructive. Who are you if you aren’t your conditioning, if you’re not the product of your past? What exactly is under there?

The most radical part of this process was finding out that I could withstand an enormous amount of emotional pain. Rupert Spira’s teachings especially helped with this, or maybe I was just partial to his gentle, deeply intelligent explanations in the YouTube videos I found and devoured. He was in the nondual tradition stemming from Advaita Vedanta, and what he calls the direct path. The direct path led you straight to your essential nature, which was pure awareness and devoid of, or beyond, thought or emotional content or objective experience.

But he also talked about the tantric approach, which was about bringing feelings close, so close that it was just the raw experience—not the story, not the thought, but “the raw experience in the body.” So instead of the separate self going into flight from the experience, you were absolutely up against it, feeling it as sensation.

I tried this. I went up against the grief, the longing, the missing, the keening, the despair. I touched into it, withdrew, touched into it again. I stayed there with it for as long as I could.

If something shocking and terrible happens, you might feel that you’re going to be consumed by the feelings about it. The intensity of them threatens absolutely everything and, naturally, you don’t want to go near them. But then you do. And in doing so there is some kind of distillation. It is nothing other than what it is in its purest form. And then, although I didn’t know this for quite some time, there begins to be an alchemical change.

In good moments I make him into a character, a mythic figure, because I can. Who is to stop me? It’s a creative act. I can make him into what I want and need him to be. He’s not a ghost. He’s a guide, a teacher, showing me the way out of darkness. He’s a doorway leading me out of a closed room.’ [Via]

3) The Movie James Franco Doesn’t Want You To See by Lola Sebastian:

GABBLER RECOMMENDS: “Tania James on Trust, Truth, and the Desire to Create Something That Lasts”

From the podcast:

Tania James: Yeah, I don’t think he actually commissioned the elephant clock. I kind of created this moment. But I think he would’ve really responded to that object that was created and designed by a 12th-century Muslim polymath. His name was Al-Jazari and he is well known in the Arab world. I don’t know. But when I discovered this thing, this was a whole other world of automatons that I had not read about.

I had only associated automatons with Europe, but here he was doing it in the 1100s. And I think that Tipu Sultan would’ve been really attracted to this idea behind the elephant clock, which is that each part of it represents a certain part of civilization, but none of those civilizations he’s mentioning are European. So I felt that he would really have been attracted to that, but I didn’t find that anywhere in the historical record. I just made up that he had that commission.

[Via]

Mentioned in the podcast is Tipu’s Tiger automaton:

BookTuber Tuesday – Why We Needed To Relearn The Classics

Quotes from Before We Were Trans: A New History of Gender by Kit Heyam

“The second problem with our existing criteria for inclusion in ‘trans history’ is that they privilege an incredibly narrow version of what it means to be trans. The trans histories we tend to tell are those that conform to the trans narrative that’s centered and recapitulated in contemporary media. The non-binary writer and activist Jacob Tobia, in their memoir Sissy: A Coming-Of-Gender Story, has a brilliantly likened this narrative to the game Mad Lib: a story with pre-written skeleton format, where the teller fills in the specifics from a limited list of options.”

 

 

 

“Our inability to know their individual experiences doesn’t exclude these people from trans history. In a period where clothing helped to make gender – when to change your dress was to change your gender – contemporary responses show that the genders of gender-nonconforming people were understood in non-binary ways. This chapter of the past, then, underlies how the way was think about gender has shifted over time, and how we need to be expansive in our thinking about what counts as part of trans history.”

 

 

“In other words, inversion wasn’t a synonym for homosexuality: it was a spectrum of gendered and sexual experience, ranging from what we would now call bisexuality to what we would now call trans identity. …But for others, inversion offered a valuable way to make sense of their experience. Some of the ideas about how inversion changed a person’s gender are based on stereotypes – for example, when Krafft-Ebing wrote that the second-degree invert ‘feels himself to be a woman during the sexual act,’ it seems pretty clear that he was equating ‘woman’ with ‘enjoys being penetrated’ – but if those inverts were socialized to believe that those stereotypes were real, seeing being penetrated as an intrinsically female thing, then this would still have affected their sense of gender. Inversion also offered many people who experienced queer attraction an explanation for the discomfort and lack of connection they felt with normative ideas of maleness and femaleness (something that, as I’ll say more about later, still resonates with many gay, lesbian and bi people today). As a result, the idea of inversion was embraced positively by many, persisting in Britain as the dominant way of understanding queer attraction even after Freud’s work offer an alternative model that didn’t connect sexuality with gender.”

 

 

“If queer attraction and queer sex had gendered meanings in particular historical periods and cultures, I can’t – no one should – just ignore that because it doesn’t sit comfortably alongside the ideals I personally hold today.”

 

 

“It has become commonplace for groups like Indian hijras and Native American/First Nations Two-Spirit people, who cannot be accurately categorized by binary gender, to be namechecked as part of any argument for non-binary recognition. If ‘other’ cultures have non-binary genders, the argument goes, this proves that the Western gender binary is arbitrary. Some trans people have even been prompted to argue that they were not ‘born into the wrong body,’ but ‘born into the wrong culture.’”

BookTuber Tuesday: How To Stop Caring And Learn To Love Spoilers