[a website for the Editor and Narrator of the Circo del Herrero series]
If you haven’t gotten a chance to watch the full documentary, we recommend it.
[Sir Terry Pratchett will be missed.]
[“BLA and GB Gabbler” (really just a pen name – singular) are the Editor and Narrator behind THE AUTOMATION, vol. 1 of the Circo del Herrero series. They are on facebook, twitter, tumblr, goodreads, and Vulcan’s shit list.]
“Representations of magic and witchcraft in American history and popular culture fall into two distinct and contradictory discourses of deviance and empowerment. In the first of these, magical ability is viewed as dangerous and monstrous, an unnatural power to be destroyed in conjunction with this approach to witchcraft as threat to the social order is the belief that such power should be domesticated, brought under forcible control if it cannot be utterly eliminated. In contrast, the second body of discourse addressing representations of witchcraft is one which views magical as a source of individual power and agency, usually feminine. From this perspective, witchcraft offers a means for expression of these aspects of identity negated by larger sociocultural structures, providing an alternative means of power, oftentimes fr otherwise disenfranchised women. Notions of performativity are central to this sense of empowerment, with women self-reflexively construction their magical identities as witches, as well as focusing on the physically and socially performative process of representing self and exercising change in the surrounding world. These two categories often overlap, and, regardless of readings of good or evil, power or performativity, both of these discourse meet in the representation of Otherness; as Emily D. Edwards argues, “The witch is someone strange, a curious ‘other’ who stands outside legitimate territories to intimidate the status quo.” Any representation of magic and witchcraft in American popular culture must necessarily negotiate the dual discourses of deviance and empowerment, as well as the engagement with Otherness, reconciling these differing perspective either by critiquing or negating one of the two, or by highlighting the problematic nature of their intersection. The discourse of magic in American myth differs significantly from those surrounding gender, race, and home because perceptions of magic have not undergone the dramatic challenges and changes faced by these other themes. However, the struggle between polarized notions of magic is indicative of cultural engagement with the supernatural and, more profoundly, anxieties surrounding the figure of the powerful woman.” – The Wizard of Oz as American Myth, Alissa Burger.
[“BLA and GB Gabbler” (really just a pen name – singular) are the Editor and Narrator behind THE AUTOMATION, vol. 1 of the Circo del Herrero series. They are on facebook, twitter, tumblr, goodreads, and Vulcan’s shit list.]
Please use your free will and choose whether or not to follow accordingly.
[“BLA and GB Gabbler” (really just a pen name – singular) are the Editor and Narrator behind THE AUTOMATION, vol. 1 of the Circo del Herrero series. They are on facebook, twitter, tumblr, goodreads, and Vulcan’s shit list.]
“Humans have been experimenting with automatons for centuries, but it is only we moderns who have worried about the consequences. The Greeks saw nothing to fear from artificial life. In their mythology, the god Hephaestus was responsible for the creation of mechanized beings—from the golden slaves he designed for his personal use to the bronze giant Talos, who guarded the island of Crete. Stopping one of these machines was as simple as removing the plug and letting the ichor (immortal blood) run out.” – Amanda Foreman.
We tend to like the idea of Automata and cyborgs. For no reason in particular.
[“BLA and GB Gabbler” (really just a pen name – singular) are the Editor and Narrator behind THE AUTOMATION, vol. 1 of the Circo del Herrero series. They are on facebook, twitter, tumblr, goodreads, and Vulcan’s shit list.]
